all - Opinion Summaries
Page 63 of 64
Showing Result 621 - 630 of 639
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING & DRY DOCK CO. v. STILLEYUnited States Fourth Circuit
Admiralty, Injury & Tort LawThe last maritime employer rule, assigning full liability to the last employer covered by the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act who... |
03/12/2001 | 00-1155 |
LEWIS v. LEWIS & CLARK MARINE, INC.United States Supreme Court
AdmiraltyState courts may adjudicate personal injury claims against vessel owners pursuant to the savings clause of 28 USC 1333(1) so long as the vessel... |
02/21/2001 | 99-1331 |
SEA-LAND SERV., INC. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Admiralty, Commercial Law, International TradeThe federal circuit decision Texaco Marine Serv., Inc. v. US, 44 F.3d 1539, 1543-44 (Fed. Cir. 1994) changed Customs- policy towards dutiability of... |
02/16/2001 | 00-1047 |
HALL v. NOBLE DRILLING (U.S.) INC.United States Fifth Circuit
AdmiraltyMaintenance costs need not be prorated to account for a seaman's family where the seaman is the sole breadwinner for his family, because the seaman is... |
02/14/2001 | 00-60063, 00-60065 |
FISHMAN & TOBIN, INC. v. TROPICAL SHIPPING & CONSTR. CO., LTD.United States Eleventh Circuit
AdmiraltyUnder the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 46 USC 1300 et seq, a unit of measurement must be clearly denoted on the cargo manifest, customs declaration,... |
01/31/2001 | 99-4375 |
BUNGE CORP. v. FREEPORT MARINE REPAIR, INC.United States Eleventh Circuit
AdmiraltyUnder the "Louisiana Rule," a partially-built cargo ship not rigged for steering is still a "vessel" for burden shifting purposes in claims where a... |
01/30/2001 | 99-14019 |
US v. TUCOR INTERNATIONALUnited States Ninth Circuit
Admiralty, Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil ProcedureUnder the Hyde Act, Government's discredited argument that immunity from antitrust liability under Section 7(a)(4) of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 USC... |
01/25/2001 | 00-10167 |
MORRIS v. PRINCES CRUISESUnited States Ninth Circuit
Admiralty, Civil ProcedureDistrict court retains removal jurisdiction if plaintiff fails to seek remand, under 28 USC 1447(e), of claims falling under the court's admiralty... |
01/10/2001 | 99-55092 |
THE TOKIO MARINE & FIRE INSURANCE CO., LTD v. FLORA MVUnited States Fifth Circuit
Admiralty, Injury & Tort LawCOLREG Rule 8(c) is suggestive, not mandatory, so the district court need not have applied the Pennsylvania Rule (providing a rebuttable presumption... |
01/03/2001 | 99-30913 |
GAROFALO v. PRINCESS CRUISESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Admiralty, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment LawThe Death on the High Seas Act, 46 U.S.C. 761 et seq, preempts an employer-s state law claim in a subrogation action to recover from a third party... |
12/29/2000 | B127126 |
Results 621 to 630 of 639