all - Opinion Summaries
Page 61 of 62
Showing Result 601 - 610 of 617
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
SKF USA INC. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, International TradeThe US Department of Commerce must adequately explain why it has interpreted the phrase "foreign like product" one way when making price-based... |
08/24/2001 | 00-1423; 00-1465 |
AM. SILICON TECHS., v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
International TradeThe Department of Commerce may reasonably accept the depreciation calculation of a foreign entity accused of dumping. |
08/16/2001 | 00-1400 |
KOENIG & BAUER-ALBERT AG v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
International TradeIn determining anti-dumping margins, the "normal value" of the subject merchandise for a sale made by a US affiliate of a foreign company is compared... |
08/09/2001 | 00-1387 |
BESTFOODS v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
International Trade19 CFR 102.13(b), withholding de minimis treatment under the federal marking statute from most agricultural products, is a valid exercise of... |
07/26/2001 | 00-1547 |
KOYO SEIKO CO., LTD. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, International TradeThe Department of Commerce's regulation, 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), providing for the use of entered value of imported merchandise in the assessment rate... |
07/20/2001 | 00-1500 |
ECKSTROM INDUS., INC. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
International TradeThe Commerce Department's 1993 Anti-dumping Order concerning stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings, 58 Fed. Reg. 33,250, does not cover cast... |
07/02/2001 | 00-1117 |
US v. MEAD CORP.United States Supreme Court
Administrative Law, International TradeA tariff classification has no claim to judicial deference under Chevron, there being no indication that Congress intended such a ruling to carry the... |
06/18/2001 | 99-1434 |
SKF USA, INC. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Administrative Law, International TradeBecause a loss incurred by an importer on the sale of its Korean subsidiary is not compelled or forbidden by statute, the Department of Commerce is... |
05/25/2001 | 00-1305 |
GEN. ELEC. CO. - MED. SYS. GROUP v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, International TradeMultiformat cameras used with computerized tomography x-ray scanners are properly classified under subheading 9022.90.60 of the Harmonized Tariff... |
04/19/2001 | 00-1263 |
MICRON TECH., INC. v. U.S.United States Federal Circuit
International TradeAmendments to the Tariff Act of 1930 require the Department of Commerce to deduct selling expenses listed in 19 USC 1677a(d) from the starting price... |
03/07/2001 | 00-1058, 00-1060 |
Results 601 to 610 of 617