United States Federal Circuit

The US Department of Commerce must adequately explain why it has interpreted the phrase "foreign like product" one way when making price-based calculations for normal value and a different way when calculating constructed value.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/24/2001
• Published 08/24/2001

Judges

• DYK, Circuit Judge., Before MICHEL, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Herbert C. Shelley,Steptoe & Johnson LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants in 00-1423, SKF USA Inc., et al.   Of counsel was Alice A. Kipel., Max F. Schutzman, Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellants in 00-1465, the Barden Corporation, et al.   With him on the brief were Andrew B. Schroth, and Mark E. Pardo.   Of counsel was Adam M. Dambrov.   Also of counsel was Jeffrey S. Grimson, of Washington, DC.


• For Appellees:
  
• Velta A. Melnbrencis, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee in 00-1423 and 00-1465, United States.   With her on the brief was David M. Cohen, Director.   Of counsel on the brief were John D. McInerney, Acting Chief Counsel for Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Berniece A. Browne, Senior Counsel, and David R. Mason., Geert De Prest, Stewart and Stewart, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee in 00-1423 and 00-1465, the Torrington Company.   With him on the brief was Terence P. Stewart.   Of counsel were Wesley K. Caine, and Lane S. Hurewitz.