all - Opinion Summaries
Page 61 of 62
Showing Result 601 - 610 of 617
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
BISHOP v. EQUINOX INT'L CORP.United States Tenth Circuit
Attorney's Fees, Intellectual Property, TrademarkWhere plaintiff lacks an active business presence of substantial magnitude or profitability, and does not lose any sales or customer goodwill due to... |
07/20/2001 | 99-5215 |
STATE CONTRACTING & ENGINEERING CORP. v. STATE OF FLORIDAUnited States Federal Circuit
Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Trademark, PatentBecause a waiver of sovereign immunity must be express and equivocal, filing a counterclaim during a period when the State was reasonably unsure about... |
07/20/2001 | 00-1434 |
NAT'L ASS'N FOR HEALTHCARE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CENT. ARKANSAS AGENCY ON AGING, INC.United States Eighth Circuit
Intellectual Property, TrademarkThe holder of state-registered trademark is only entitled to protection in areas where it had market penetration against the holder of a... |
07/11/2001 | 00-1964 |
SHIELDS v. ZUCCARINIUnited States Third Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, TrademarkRegistering as domain names the misspellings of famous marks for purposes of profiting from consumer confusion violates 15 USC 1125(d)(1)(A)(ii)(I)... |
06/15/2001 | 00-2236 |
B&B HARDWARE, INC. v. HARGIS INDUS., INC.United States Eighth Circuit
Intellectual Property, TrademarkThe court-s use of an example cited by a trial witness does not necessarily support the inference that the court is endorsing the testimony of that... |
06/11/2001 | 00-2542 |
ALLARD ENTERS., INC. v. ADVANCED PROGRAMMING RES., INC.United States Sixth Circuit
Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, TrademarkDefendants may not interpose a counterclaim for cancellation of plaintiff's federal trademark registration when the circuit court limited remand of... |
05/08/2001 | 99-4402 |
FAR OUT PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. OSKARUnited States Ninth Circuit
Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, TrademarkA trademark owner is not collaterally estopped by a state trademark verdict where it was merely in privity with state court defendants and where owner... |
04/24/2001 | 99-56739 |
NEW KAYAK POOL CORP. v. R & P POOLS, INC.United States Second Circuit
Intellectual Property, TrademarkIn determining whether to grant a preliminary injunction in a trademark infringement case, a district court must apply the multi-factor balancing test... |
04/10/2001 | 00-9077 |
BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE RESEARCH, INC. v. AUTO. CLUB DE L'OUEST DE LA FRANCEUnited States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, TrademarkWhere there is undue delay in bringing a request for cancellation of a trademark, the doctrine of laches takes account of the economic prejudice... |
04/06/2001 | 00-1036 |
CHANCE v. PAC-TEL TELETRAC INC.United States Ninth Circuit
Intellectual Property, TrademarkWhere the owner of a service mark cannot show any sales of the service, the totality of the circumstances test suggests insufficient use in commerce... |
03/20/2001 | 98-55160 |
Results 601 to 610 of 617