all - Opinion Summaries
Page 352 of 393
Showing Result 3511 - 3520 of 3928
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
CASSIM v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Insurance LawA new trial is mandated in an action based on alleged fraud in an insurance claim, where attorney comments in arguments to the jury suggested to... |
07/29/2002 | B139975 |
ZURICH INS. CO. v. LOGITRANS, INC.United States Sixth Circuit
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance LawA party who has not suffered injury in fact by defendants has no standing to bring an action, or to make a motion to substitute the real party in... |
07/29/2002 | 01-1018 |
MORLAN v. UNIVERSAL GUARANTY LIFE INS. CO.United States Seventh Circuit
Bankruptcy Law, Class Actions, Insurance LawClaims for welfare benefits, not limited to health-care benefits, are assignable provided that the ERISA plan itself permits assignment; dismissal of... |
07/26/2002 | 01-3795 |
STOOPS v. ABBASSICalifornia Court of Appeal
Health Law, Insurance LawA member of a physicians' interindemnity trust, created pursuant to Insurance Code section 1280.7, may not directly sue other members of the trust for... |
07/26/2002 | B144337 |
MCMEANS v. SCRIPPS HEALTHCalifornia Court of Appeal
Class Actions, Contracts, Health Law, Insurance LawDefendant hospital operator's lien rights do not extend beyond the amount it agreed to receive from patients' medical insurance carriers as payment... |
07/24/2002 | D035486 |
FRAZAR v. GILBERTUnited States Fifth Circuit
Civil Rights, Government Benefits, Health Law, Insurance LawOrders requiring detailed state action, in the administration of a Medicaid program to afford health care to a certified class of indigent children,... |
07/24/2002 | 00-41112/01-40667 |
E.M.M.I. INC. v. ZURICH AM. INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Insurance Law, Property Law & Real EstateA jeweler's block insurance policy does not provide coverage when the insured's employee is standing behind, but not "actually in or upon" his car, at... |
07/22/2002 | B152740 |
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE CO. OF CANADA v. RICHARDSONUnited States Fifth Circuit
Insurance LawLouisiana's doctrine of substantial compliance will not apply to change the beneficiary of a life insurance policy without evidence that 1) the named... |
07/22/2002 | 01-30392 |
ROYAL SURPLUS LINES INS. CO., INC. v. RANGER INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Contracts, Insurance LawPlaintiffs in a breach of contract action could properly sue both an insured and its insurer in the same action, where there was no misjoinder on the... |
07/17/2002 | B152561 |
NAT'L UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA v. WILLISUnited States Fifth Circuit
Corporation & Enterprise Law, Insurance LawBecause a corporate officer failed to provide notice of the claims asserted against him when he was first made aware of circumstances that could... |
07/17/2002 | 01-20723 |
Results 3511 to 3520 of 3928