all - Opinion Summaries

BD. OF EDUC. v. AM. BIOSCIENCE, INC.

Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, Patent
In an inventorship action related to a chemotherapeutic agent, the district court erred in its determination of inventorship as to the true and...

ATKINS v. FISCHER

Copyright, Intellectual Property
Summary judgment for defendants, in an action alleging copyright infringement in commercial use of a six-pack carrier and bottle designs, is reversed...

ETW CORP. v. JIREH PUBL'G, INC.

Injury & Tort Law, Intellectual Property, Sports Law, Trademark
The presence of Tiger Woods's image on art prints did not amount to a valid Lanham Act false endorsement claim, and did not violate the right of...

COOK INC. v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP.

Contracts, Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, Patent
The district judge did not err in finding that a transaction between plaintiff and a third party was a de facto assignment under Washington law, and...

CAT INTERNET SERVS., INC. v. PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INS. CO.

Cyberspace Law, Insurance Law, Intellectual Property, Trademark
Under Pennsylvania law, trademark infringement through misuse of a domain name for the purpose of selling pornographic materials and magazines,...

EMERGENCY ONE, INC. v. AM. FIRE EAGLE ENGINE CO.

Intellectual Property, Trademark
A nationwide injunction entered by the district court prohibiting plaintiff from using its mark in connection with the sale of its fire trucks, or...

TEHRANI v. HAMILTON MED., INC.

Health Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
District court's grant of summary judgment of infringement to plaintiff, concerning an apparatus and method for controlling a medical respirator, is...

SUPERFORMANCE INT'L INC. v. HARTFORD CAS. INS. CO.

Insurance Law, Intellectual Property, Trademark
Underlying complaints for trademark infringement did not fall under the scope of coverage as "personal and advertising injury" in plaintiff's policy,...

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES I, LTD. v. MERCK KGAA

Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, Patent
The district court correctly construed the claims and determined that defendant's infringing activity did not fall within the safe harbor of 35 U.S.C....

BOURNS, INC. v. RAYCHEM CORP.

Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Intellectual Property, Trade Secrets
Jury instructions as a whole did not allow the jury to find actual misappropriation based on inevitable disclosure alone, thus findings of...