United States Ninth Circuit
BOURNS, INC. v. RAYCHEM CORP., 01-56245, 01-56246, 01-56252
Jury instructions as a whole did not allow the jury to find actual misappropriation based on inevitable disclosure alone, thus findings of misappropriation and associated damages are affirmed. Defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law is granted where plaintiff has no antirtust case.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/04/2002
- Decided 06/05/2003
- Published 06/05/2003
Judges
- Before PREGERSON, NOONAN and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Charles C. Lifland, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff Bourns, Inc.
- For Appellees:
- Peter A. Wald, Esq., Latham & Watkins, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for defendant Raychem Corporation., Allan Gabriel, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for defendant Steven D. Hogge, etc. et al.