Skip to main content

all - Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 282 of 295 Showing Result 2811 - 2820 of 2941
Description Date Docket #

IN THE INTEREST OF K. R.

Supreme Court of Texas
Family Law
Harmless error rule may apply to improper shackling of defendant, a prison inmate on release, during trial terminating his relationship with his...
11/08/2001 00-0907

MORRELL v. MOCK

United States Seventh Circuit
Family Law
Absent exigent circumstances, substantive due process requires that a parent have the opportunity to object to enforcement of a foreign court's order...
11/01/2001 00-1429

LOH v. LOH

California Court of Appeal
Family Law
Evidence of lifestyle, particularly a lifestyle subsidized by a new "nonmarital partner" is not an adequate substitute for a spouse's most current tax...
10/29/2001 G028717

IN REJANET T.

California Court of Appeal
Family Law
Under Welf. & Inst. Code 300(b), allegations that children had not attended school and had head lice are insufficient to establish risk of...
10/29/2001 B147625

IN RE JESSE W.

California Court of Appeal
Family Law
Parent waives objection over failure of juvenile court judge to countersign a referee's dispositional order on a supplemental petition to remove the...
10/29/2001 A094156

SHARON S. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY (ANNETTE F.)

California Court of Appeal
Family Law
Statutes governing independent adoptions, Fam. Code 8800 et seq, require a relinquishment of parental rights, and a second parent adoption cannot...
10/26/2001 D037871

US v. LEWKO

United States First Circuit
Constitutional Law, Family Law
Because neither the Child Support Recovery Act, 18 USC 228(a)(1), nor the Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act, 18 USC 228(a)(3), have the purpose or...
10/25/2001 01-1231

GAGAN v. MONROE

United States Seventh Circuit
Family Law, Judgement Enforcement
Because Ariz. Rev. Stat. section 25-215(D) is merely a procedural rule that has no relevance to judgments in cases brought outside Arizona, community...
10/23/2001 99-2327

STEPHEN V. v. DOLORES D.

California Court of Appeal
Family Law
A birth parent may effectively relinquish parental rights, even if she failed to check off all the boxes in a statement of understanding form, as long...
10/23/2001 B151279

IN RE: SANTOS Y.

California Court of Appeal
Family Law, Indian Law
The Indian Child Welfare Act may not apply to a child who has lived exclusively with non-Indian families, and where the biological Indian parent had...
10/19/2001 B144822

Results 2811 to 2820 of 2941

Copied to clipboard