California Court of Appeal

Evidence of lifestyle, particularly a lifestyle subsidized by a new "nonmarital partner" is not an adequate substitute for a spouse's most current tax returns to justify an increase in child support obligations.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/29/2001
• Published 10/29/2001

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Jeffrey W. Doeringer, Huntington Beach, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Charlton H. Holland III, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Frank S. Furtek and Mary Tilton, Deputy Attorneys General, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Respondent.