all - Opinion Summaries

MATTEL, INC. v. GREINER AND HAUSSER GMBH

Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Patent
In ordering dismissal of this action concerning the Barbie doll, district court improperly determined that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the...

TY INC. v. SOFTBELLY'S, INC.

Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Trademark
District court judge showed excessive procedural lenience towards plaintiff at various points, and his finding of trademark dilution had scant...

VLIW TECH., LLC v. HEWLETT-PACKARD CO.

Contracts, Intellectual Property, Trade Secrets
Court of Chancery erred in granting two 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss plaintiff's breach of contract complaint. Contract provisions regarding...

RECORDING INDUS. ASS'N OF AM., INC. v. VERIZON INTERNET SERV., INC.

Communications Law, Copyright, Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property
Digital Millennium Copyright Act section 512(h) does not authorize the issuance of a subpoena to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) acting solely as a...

KALANTARI v. NITV, INC.

Copyright, Entertainment Law, Intellectual Property, International Trade
The Iranian trade embargo does not prohibit the commercial importation of movies from Iran, the copyright of such movies, or the assignment to a...

ULEAD SYS., INC. v. LEX COMPUTER & MGMT. CORP.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Summary judgment of inequitable conduct, finding that defendant's patent is unenforceable and expired because it falsely claimed status (and paid...

SULZER TEXTIL A.G. v. PICANOL N.V.

Intellectual Property, Patent
In patent cases in which claim construction rulings on disputed claim terms are made prior to trial and followed by the parties during the course of...

ERICSSON, INC. v. HARRIS CORP.

Communications Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Grant of JMOL that defendants do not infringe plaintiff's US patent for an apparatus for supplying power to a telephone set in a telecom system, is...

NOVO INDUS., L.P. v. MICRO MOLDS CO.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Defendant's appeal of district court's finding that defendant infringed plaintiff's patent is reversed because the district court lacked authority to...