United States Federal Circuit
KUMAR v. OVONIC BATTERY CO., INC., 02-1551, 02-1574, 03-1091
Summary judgment of non-infringement is vacated and remanded because plaintiff's proposed claim construction, which relies on prior art cited in the patent, properly trumps the inconsistent dictionary definition.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/11/2003
- Published 12/11/2003
Judges
- Before BRYSON, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Kaplesh Kumar, of Wellesley, Massachusetts, argued pro se.
- For Appellees:
- Patrick J. Coyne, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Troy E. Grabow.