all - Opinion Summaries
Page 23 of 23
Showing Result 221 - 229 of 229
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
HOWARD v. S. ILLINOIS RIVERBOAT CASINO CRUISES, INC.United States Seventh Circuit
Admiralty, Injury & Tort Law, Transportation, Gaming LawAn indefinitely moored dockside casino with no transportation function or purpose is not a vessel "in navigation." Thus, injured plaintiffs-employees... |
04/09/2004 | 02-3818, 02-3819 |
US v. LIANGUnited States Ninth Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing, Gaming LawExtraordinary eyesight cannot be considered a "special skill" supporting a U.S.S.G. section 3B1.3 enhancement in a casino card cheating scheme.... |
03/31/2004 | 02-10549 |
US v. IACABONIUnited States First Circuit
Asset Forfeiture, Criminal Law & Procedure, Gaming LawDistrict court's decision to forfeit the payouts to winning gamblers is consonant with the purposes of 18 U.S.C. section 1956(a)(1)(A)(i); amounts... |
03/30/2004 | 02-2141 |
SNOWNEY v. HARRAH'S ENTM'T, INC.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Entertainment Law, Media Law, Gaming LawThe defendants who own and operate Nevada hotels have sufficient contacts with California to justify the exercise of personal jurisdiction based on... |
03/11/2004 | B164118 |
BROWN v. ARGOSY GAMING CO., L.P.United States Seventh Circuit
Civil Procedure, Injury & Tort Law, Gaming LawCourt lacks jurisdiction over the district court's refusal to certify the question of whether a wife has a cause of action against a casino that... |
03/08/2004 | 03-1280 |
US v. MAGINNISUnited States Ninth Circuit
Tax Law, Gaming LawLump sum consideration for the assignment of the right to future lottery payments constituted ordinary income, not a capital gain. Summary judgment... |
01/30/2004 | 02-35664 |
RACEWAY PARK, INC. v. STATE OF OHIOUnited States Sixth Circuit
Constitutional Law, Entertainment Law, Sports Law, Gaming LawOhio statutory provisions governing the allocation of proceeds from simulcast horse racing does not effectuate a taking for Fifth Amendment purposes,... |
01/15/2004 | 02-3466, 02-3487 |
ARTICHOKE JOE'S CALIFORNIA GRAND CASINO v. NORTONUnited States Ninth Circuit
Constitutional Law, Indian Law, Gaming LawThe Indian Gaming Regulatory Act allows the State of California to grant a monopoly on casino-style gaming to the Indian tribes. The monopoly granted... |
12/22/2003 | 02-16508 |
WILLIAMS v. AZTAR INDIANA GAMING CO.United States Seventh Circuit
Gaming LawPlaintiff's appeal of defendant's summary judgment based on the RICO statute is affirmed as plaintiff's RICO claim was found to be frivolous and... |
12/05/2003 | 03-1822 |
Results 221 to 229 of 229