all - Opinion Summaries
Page 21 of 23
Showing Result 201 - 210 of 229
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Super Ct. of Lake County (McAllister)California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, Gaming Law, Indian Law, Labor & Employment LawThe Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians, which operates a casino and was sued for breach of contract for an alleged failure to provide adequate severance... |
11/01/2005 | A108615 |
Romanski v. Detroit EntertainmentUnited States Sixth Circuit
Civil Rights, Gaming Law, Injury & Tort Law, RemediesIn a section 1983 suit alleging unlawful arrest, a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff is affirmed; however, a $600,000 punitive damages award is... |
10/28/2005 | 04-1354 |
Crusius v. Illinois Gaming BoardSupreme Court of Illinois
Consumer Protection Law, Gaming LawIn an action seeking a declaratory judgment that section 11.2(a) of the Riverboat Gambling Act violates the Illinois Constitution's special... |
09/22/2005 | 98351 |
Lac Du Flambeau Band v. NortonUnited States Seventh Circuit
Gaming Law, Indian LawDismissal of plaintiff-Indian Tribe's suit, challenging the Secretary of the Interior's gaming compact with another tribe, is affirmed where it has... |
09/01/2005 | 04-3571 |
Double Eagle Hotel v. NLRBUnited States Tenth Circuit
Gaming Law, Labor & Employment LawThe National Labor Relations Board properly decided that plaintiff-casino's rules, concerning how tips between slot technicians and security officers... |
07/14/2005 | 04-9520, 04-9532 |
Sorthington v. Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal
Gaming Law, Government Contracts, Government Law, Indian LawDefendant-City's resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding, concerning a casino project, is not subject to the referendum process. |
06/30/2005 | A107547 |
First Am. Kickapoo Operations v. Multimedia Games, Inc.United States Tenth Circuit
Contracts, Gaming Law, Indian Law, Injury & Tort LawUnder Oklahoma law, an unapproved management contract, being void, cannot be the basis for a suit against a third party for tortious interference. |
06/23/2005 | 03-6283 |
GF Gaming Corp. v. City of BlackhawkUnited States Tenth Circuit
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Gaming LawIn an antitrust suit concerning the gaming industry, plaintiff's claims for monetary relief are barred by the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. |
04/20/2005 | 04-1177 |
WESTLY v. SUPERIOR CT.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Gaming Law, Government Law, Indian Law, Landlord Tenant LawAgency heads and other top governmental executives are not subject to deposition absent compelling reasons. |
01/12/2005 | D045075 |
JESPERSEN v. HARRAH'S OPERATING CO.United States Ninth Circuit
Civil Rights, Gaming Law, Labor & Employment LawDefendant-casino's policy, requiring certain female employees to wear makeup, does not constitute sex discrimination since defendant imposed equal... |
12/28/2004 | 03-15045 |
Results 201 to 210 of 229