all - Opinion Summaries
Page 195 of 207
Showing Result 1941 - 1950 of 2064
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
HALL v. DEP'T OF THE TREASURYUnited States Federal Circuit
Government Benefits, Labor & Employment LawWhere a federal agency issues a decision on the merits of a claim for Law Enforcement Coverage, it waives its right under 5 CFR 831.906(e) to request... |
09/04/2001 | 00-3067 |
VINCENT v. APFELUnited States Eighth Circuit
Government BenefitsUncertainty over whether all of an annual income came from certain work may defeat a claim that disability applicant can engage in substantial gainful... |
08/30/2001 | 99-4116 |
RIVERA v. R.R. RETIREMENT BD.United States Ninth Circuit
Government BenefitsAppellate courts do not have jurisdiction to review a denial of annuity benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act where claimant fails to file a... |
08/28/2001 | 99-71278 |
MAYES v. MASSANARIUnited States Ninth Circuit
Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Evidence, Government BenefitsEven if after-discovered evidence is material to the administrative law judge's decision, petitioner must show good cause for failing to present the... |
08/27/2001 | 00-35181 |
BUSTAMANTE v. MASSANARIUnited States Ninth Circuit
Government BenefitsAdministrative Law Judges may not determine that a claimant's mental impairments are the product and consequence of alcohol abuse prior to making a... |
08/27/2001 | 99-17194 |
WATSON v. DEP'T OF THE NAVYUnited States Federal Circuit
Government Benefits, Military LawThe Merit Systems Protection Board's new approach for determining eligibility for early retirement coverage as law enforcement officers is consistent... |
08/17/2001 | 00-3387 |
VACCARO v. OFFICE OF PERS. MGMT.United States Federal Circuit
Government BenefitsWhen a divorce decree divides marital property, but defers division of community interest in the Federal Employee's Civil Service Pension and does not... |
08/17/2001 | 00-3274 |
ROLLINS v. MASSANARIUnited States Ninth Circuit
Government BenefitsAn administrative law judge may disregard a treating doctor's conclusion that applicant was disabled when doctor stated that applicant's condition... |
08/17/2001 | 99-55977 |
NAT'L ORG. OF VETERANS' ADVOCATES, INC. v. SEC'Y OF VETERANS AFFAIRSUnited States Federal Circuit
Government BenefitsThe Department of Veterans Affairs must explain its rationale for interpreting virtually identical statutes, 38 CFR 3.22 and 38 CFR 20.1106, in... |
08/16/2001 | 00-7095; 00-7096; 00-7098 |
MOAD v. MASSANARIUnited States Eighth Circuit
Government BenefitsWhere the medical record shows no objective support for claims of pain and where no medical examiner concluded that disability applicant could not... |
08/14/2001 | 00-2728 |
Results 1941 to 1950 of 2064