all - Opinion Summaries
Page 171 of 210
Showing Result 1701 - 1710 of 2096
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
HOUSEY PHARMS., INC. v. ASTRAZENECA UK LTD.United States Federal Circuit
Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, PatentPlaintiff's patent, concerning a method of screening for protein inhibitors or activators, was properly deemed invalid. Judgment of noninfringement is... |
05/07/2004 | 03-1193, 03-1210 |
ELAN CORP., PLC v. ANDRX PHARMS., INC.United States Federal Circuit
Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, PatentDistrict court erred in declaring plaintiff's patent invalid under the on-sale bar of 35 U.S.C. section 102(b). Plaintiff did not offer to sell its... |
05/05/2004 | 03-1354, 03-1355, 03-1386, 03-1387 |
STEVENS v. TAMAIUnited States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentIn this interference proceeding, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences erred in granting appellee the benefit of a Japanese patent... |
05/04/2004 | 03-1479 |
VANDERLANDE INDUS. NEDERLAND BV v. INT'L TRADE COMM'NUnited States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, International Trade, PatentThe foreign manufacturer and domestic importer of infringing "shoe-type" sortation systems were properly found to have violated section 337 of the... |
05/03/2004 | 03-1349 |
SCANNER TECHS. CORP. v. ICOS VISION SYS. CORP. N.V.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentDistrict court erred in its construction of the terms "an illumination apparatus" and "illuminating" in two of plaintiff's patents related to... |
04/23/2004 | 03-1465 |
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP. v. APOTEX CORP.United States Federal Circuit
Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, PatentJudgment of non-infringement is affirmed because the public use bar of 35 U.S.C. section 102(b) renders claim 1 of plaintiff's patent for an... |
04/23/2004 | 03-1285, 03-1313 |
GOLDEN BLOUNT, INC. v. ROBERT H. PETERSON CO.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentFinding of infringement of a patented fireplace burner assembly is reversed and remanded because the district court did not support its conclusion... |
04/19/2004 | 03-1298 |
SIERRA APPLIED SCIS., INC. v. ADVANCED ENERGY INDUS., INC.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentA case or controversy exists as to plaintiff's 2 kW power supply, based on past sales of this device; dismissal as to that product is reversed. On... |
04/13/2004 | 03-1356 |
INLAND STEEL CO. v. LTV STEEL CO.United States Federal Circuit
Attorney's Fees, Intellectual Property, PatentDefendant USX Corp. is a prevailing party, and thus is not ineligible for attorney's fees, because the district court entered a final judgment in its... |
04/09/2004 | 03-1483 |
MONSANTO CO. v. MCFARLINGUnited States Federal Circuit
Agriculture, Contracts, Intellectual Property, Patent, RemediesDefendant was properly found to have breached its Technology Agreement with plaintiff by replanting some patented soybeans. Damages award is vacated... |
04/09/2004 | 03-1177, 03-1228 |
Results 1701 to 1710 of 2096