Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


VANDERLANDE INDUS. NEDERLAND BV v. INT'L TRADE COMM'N, 03-1349

The foreign manufacturer and domestic importer of infringing "shoe-type" sortation systems were properly found to have violated section 337 of the Tarriff Act.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/03/2004
  • Published 05/03/2004

Judges

  • MICHEL, Circuit Judge., Before MICHEL, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • John M. DiMatteo,Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, of New York, NY, argued for appellants.   With him on the brief were Art C. Cody and Mary M. Manning., Terence J. Linn, Van Dyke, Gardner, Linn & Burkhart, L.L.P., of Grand Rapids, MI, argued for intervenors.   With him on the brief was Daniel Van Dyke. Also on the brief were V. James Adduci II and Sarah E. Hamblin, Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg, L.L.P., of Washington, DC. Of counsel were Jerry B. Blackstock and Leslie B. Zacks, Hunton & Williams LLP, of Atlanta, GA;  W. Scott Creasman, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy LLP, of Atlanta, GA;  and Steven E. Adkins, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, L.L.P., of Washington, DC.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael K. Haldenstein, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee.   With him on the brief were Lyn M. Schlitt, General Counsel and James M. Lyons, Deputy General Counsel.
Copied to clipboard