all - Opinion Summaries
Page 170 of 207
Showing Result 1691 - 1700 of 2064
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
KILPATRICK v. PRINCIPIUnited States Federal Circuit
Administrative Law, Government BenefitsThe Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims decision directing that specially adapted housing benefits be awarded to plaintiff, a disabled veteran, is... |
05/07/2003 | 02-7356 |
SHONTOS v. BARNHARTUnited States Eighth Circuit
Administrative Law, Government Benefits, Health Law, Labor & Employment LawDenial of Disabled Widow Benefits was erroneous where, giving health care providers' testimony proper weight, evidence showed that claimant suffered... |
05/07/2003 | 02-1866 |
US v. STOLTZUnited States Eighth Circuit
Administrative Law, Government Benefits, Government LawDistrict court did not err in finding that plaintiff was not the direct source of information about alleged fraud regarding medically necessary... |
05/05/2003 | 02-2193 |
BROWN v. USUnited States DC Circuit
Administrative Law, Government Benefits, Labor & Employment LawThe Department of Treasury, as opposed to the District of Columbia, is the proper locus of decisionmaking for calculating the amount of locality pay... |
05/02/2003 | 02-5193, 02-5194 |
TOWNSEND v. QUASIMUnited States Ninth Circuit
Civil Rights, Government Benefits, Health LawDenial of community-based long term in-home nursing care for "medically needy" disabled persons violates the ADA unless the state can demonstrate that... |
05/01/2003 | 01-35689 |
DISABLED AM. VETERANS v. SEC'Y OF VETERANS AFFAIRSUnited States Federal Circuit
Administrative Law, Government Benefits38 C.F.R. section 19.9(a)(2) is invalid because, in conjunction with the amended rule codified at 38 C.F.R. section 20.1304, it allows the Board of... |
05/01/2003 | 02-7304, 02-7305, 02-7316 |
WELLS v. PRINCIPIUnited States Federal Circuit
Administrative Law, Government BenefitsBecause the Secretary of Veterans Affairs was under no obligation to obtain a medical opinion on behalf of plaintiff, the Secretary did not violate... |
04/29/2003 | 02-7404 |
BOEHM & ASSOCS. v. WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD.California Court of Appeal
Government Benefits, Health Law, Judgement Enforcement, Labor & Employment Law, Workers' CompensationThe Medi-Cal recoupment provisions apply to workers' compensation proceedings, but Welf. & Inst. Code section 14124.78 does not apply where a... |
04/25/2003 | C036712 |
SHAFFER v. VENEMANUnited States DC Circuit
Administrative Law, Agriculture, Civil Procedure, Government BenefitsThe district court had neither subject matter nor ancillary jurisdiction over a farmer's claim which arose from an agreement with the Department of... |
04/22/2003 | 02-5009 |
ZEIGLER COAL CO. v. DIR., OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMP. PROGRAMSUnited States Seventh Circuit
Administrative Law, Admiralty, Attorney's Fees, Government Benefits, Health Law, Labor & Employment Law, Workers' CompensationAdministrative Law Judge properly found that claimant was entitled to an irrebuttable presumption of pneumoconiosis, and benefits under the Black Lung... |
04/18/2003 | 01-3211/3998 |
Results 1691 to 1700 of 2064