all - Opinion Summaries
Page 168 of 207
Showing Result 1671 - 1680 of 2064
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
CELAYA v. HALTERUnited States Ninth Circuit
Administrative Law, Government BenefitsIn denying an application for supplemental security and disability benefits, the administrative law judge did not meet his obligation to develop the... |
06/17/2003 | 01-16964 |
KROHE v. CITY OF BLOOMINGTONSupreme Court of Illinois
Government Benefits, Government Law, Injury & Tort Law, Labor & Employment LawUnder section 10(a) of the Public Safety Employee Benefits Act, the phrase "catastrophic injury" is synonymous with an injury resulting in a... |
06/10/2003 | 94112 |
BENTON v. BARNHARTUnited States Ninth Circuit
Administrative Law, Government Benefits, Health LawIn finding that a Social Security Disability Insurance claimant was not mentally disabled, the Administrative Law Judge misapplied 20 C.F.R. section... |
06/09/2003 | 02-55941 |
BLAKES v. BARNHARTUnited States Seventh Circuit
Administrative Law, Government Benefits, Health LawThe administrative law judge failed to apply the proper legal standard in considering a minor's application for Social Security Income disability... |
06/04/2003 | 02-2178 |
DIR., OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMP. PROGRAMS v. PEABODY COAL CO.United States Sixth Circuit
Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Government BenefitsThe ALJ and the Benefits Review Board lack jurisdiction over an action for reimbursement from a former employer for survivor-benefit payments made by... |
06/02/2003 | 01-4358 |
OLSZEWSKI v. SCRIPPS HEALTHSupreme Court of California
Constitutional Law, Government Benefits, Health Law, Judgement EnforcementFederal Medicaid law preempts California's provider lien statutes, Welf. & Inst. Code section 14124.791, but the trial court properly dismissed on... |
06/02/2003 | S098409 |
ANGEL v. BARNHARTUnited States Tenth Circuit
Administrative Law, Government Benefits, Health LawDenial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under the Social Security Act is reversed where the ALJ erred by... |
05/30/2003 | 02-7072 |
CARE CHOICES HMO v. ENGSTROMUnited States Sixth Circuit
Government Benefits, Health Law, Insurance Law42 U.S.C. section 1395mm(e)(4), which provides that Medicare-substitute HMOs are permitted to seek reimbursement when an insured receives benefits... |
05/30/2003 | 01-2682/2717 |
ARTZ v. BARNHARTUnited States Third Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Government Benefits, Health LawPlaintiff's disability benefits for a 14-month period, during which he was involuntarily confined in psychiatric institutions at public expense, were... |
05/29/2003 | 02-3882 |
ENCARNACION v.BARNHARTUnited States Second Circuit
Administrative Law, Government BenefitsIn an action for benefits under the federal Supplemental Security Income for the Aged, Blind, and Disabled program, 42 U.S.C. sections 1381?1383f... |
05/28/2003 | 02-6192 |
Results 1671 to 1680 of 2064