Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit


CARE CHOICES HMO v. ENGSTROM, 01-2682/2717

42 U.S.C. section 1395mm(e)(4), which provides that Medicare-substitute HMOs are permitted to seek reimbursement when an insured receives benefits from another source of insurance, does not contain an implied private right of action in federal court for Medicare-substitute HMOs.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/30/2003
  • Published 05/30/2003

Judges

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard