all - Opinion Summaries

VOELKER v. PORSCHE CARS N. AM, INC.

Consumer Protection Law, Contracts
District court's dismissal of plaintiff's claims for breach of written warranty and breach of the implied warranty of merchantability under the...

ALBERT v. TRANS UNION CORP.

Civil Procedure, Consumer Protection Law, Remedies
The court lacks jurisdiction to review the district court's determination that injunctive relief is not available for Fair Credit Reporting Act...

VALLEY DRUG CO. v. GENEVA PHARM., INC.

Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Consumer Protection Law
The district court incorrectly applied the law in determining that two agreements among defendants were per se violations of section 1 of the Sherman...

GLEN HOLLY ENTM'T, INC. v. TEKTRONIX, INC.

Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Consumer Protection Law
A private antitrust plaintiff alleged enough to establish factually that it was both a customer and a competitor in a slightly different market, for...

THEOFEL v. FAREY-JONES

Communications Law, Consumer Protection Law, Cyberspace Law
Section 2701(c)(1) of the Stored Communications Act does not provide refuge to a defendant who obtains consent by exploiting a known mistake relating...

FORD MOTOR CO. v. CATALANOTTE

Consumer Protection Law, Cyberspace Law
An award of statutory damages under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act is affirmed, as liability under the Act may be based on trafficking...

HUSSEY-HEAD v. WORLD SAVINGS &LOAN ASS'N

Banking Law, Consumer Protection Law
In a consumer's action against her lender, claiming it had furnished incomplete and inaccurate information to several credit reporting agencies, there...

ROBERTS v. FLEET BANK (R.I.)

Banking Law, Consumer Protection Law
In action alleging violations of the Truth in Lending Act, a bank's solicitation materials could cause a reasonable consumer to be confused about the...

FREEMAN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

Commercial Law, Consumer Protection Law
The trial court appropriately concluded that a shopping card service fee was not an unconscionable term and thus did not abuse its discretion in...

LIPPITT v. RAYMOND JAMES FIN. SERVS., INC.

Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Banking Law, Civil Procedure, Consumer Protection Law
A complaint against brokerage firms under California's Unfair Competition Law, challenging methods used in selling and marketing callable certificates...