United States Third Circuit

In action alleging violations of the Truth in Lending Act, a bank's solicitation materials could cause a reasonable consumer to be confused about the temporal quality of a credit card offer, thus summary judgment for the bank is reversed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/27/2003
• Published 08/27/2003

Judges

• Before ALITO, FUENTES and OBERDORFER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Ira Neil Richards [Argued], Gary M. Goldstein, Trujillo Rodriguez & Richards, The Penthouse, Philadelphia, PA, Roberta D. Liebenberg, Mary L. Russell, Fine Kaplan & Black, Philadelphia, PA, Marc H. Edelson, Hoffman & Edelson, Doylestown, PA, for Appellant., Mark A. Aronchick, Hangley Aronchick Segal & Pudlin, Philadelphia, PA, amicus curiae for American Bankers Association, American Financial Services Association, and Consumer Bankers Association., Horace G. Sneed, Office of the Comptroller of Currency, Washington, DC, amicus curiae for the Office of Comptroller of the Currency.


• For Appellees:
  
• Alan S. Kaplinsky, Burt M. Rublin [Argued], Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.