Skip to main content

all - Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 119 of 121 Showing Result 1181 - 1190 of 1203
Description Date Docket #

EDELL & ASSOCS., P.C. v. LAW OFFICES OF PETER G. ANGELOS

United States Fourth Circuit
Attorney's Fees, Ethics & Professional Responsibility
Where one law firm assists another law firm in contingency fee litigation on the express condition of sharing in the contingency fee award, silence...
08/24/2001 00-2069

GURSEY, SCHNEIDER & CO. v. WASSER, ROSENSON & CARTER

California Court of Appeal
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Legal Malpractice
Public policy does not bar an accountant's indemnity suit against a lawyer where a shared client originally sued both lawyer and accountant for...
07/25/2001 B142728

SALDANA v. KMART CORP.

United States Third Circuit
Ethics & Professional Responsibility
Use of vulgar language on a handful of occasions, outside the presence of the court (though directed at opposing counsel), does not rise to the level...
07/23/2001 99-4055; 00-3749

MUSSER v. PROVENCHER

California Court of Appeal
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Legal Malpractice
Co-counsel may seek equitable indemnity against one another where one counsel has associated another to assist in a particular aspect of the case, and...
07/10/2001 A088934

CHAMBERS v. STENGEL

United States Sixth Circuit
Constitutional Law, Ethics & Professional Responsibility
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. 21A.300 and 21A.310, which prohibit and criminalize the solicitation of accident victims by attorneys within thirty days of an...
07/09/2001 98-6349

PEOPLE v.DEPALLO

Court of Appeals of New York
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure, Ethics & Professional Responsibility
Attorney who informed the court ex parte of defendant's perjured testimony was not ineffective counsel for purposes of the Sixth Amendment, and the...
07/02/2001 2 No. 102

AM. EQUITY INS. CO. v. BECK

California Court of Appeal
Ethics & Professional Responsibility
Counsel who associate to concurrently represent clients do not owe each other a fiduciary duty. They only owe a duty of loyalty to the clients.
06/26/2001 A092221

GUNNING v. CAUDILL

California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Ethics & Professional Responsibility
An assignment from an heir to an heir hunter of part of heir's inheritance in exchange for information concerning the inheritance is valid and does...
06/26/2001 B145083

MOORE v. MORTON

United States Third Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Ethics & Professional Responsibility
In rape case, prosecutor's closing remark that defendant had preference for women of victim's race based on race of defendant's wife and argument that...
06/22/2001 98-5429

ROE #2 v. OGDEN

United States Tenth Circuit
Civil Procedure, Civil Rights, Ethics & Professional Responsibility
Law school graduate who was sitting for state bar examination has standing to challenge state bar application requiring disclosure of past treatment...
06/19/2001 00-1302

Results 1181 to 1190 of 1203

Copied to clipboard