all - Opinion Summaries
Page 108 of 115
Showing Result 1071 - 1080 of 1148
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. FED. COMMUNICATIONS COMM'NUnited States Second Circuit
Communications Law47 USC 251(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 allows the FCC to impose a 10-digit dialing rule under the North American Numbering Plan for... |
10/05/2001 | 99-4205 |
TKR CABLE CO. v. CABLE CITY CORP.United States Third Circuit
Communications LawA cable television descrambler does not facilitate the interception of "communications by radio" so the statutory damages available under 47 USC 605... |
10/01/2001 | 98-5341 |
CBS BROAD., INC. v. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATION CORP.United States Eleventh Circuit
Communications LawUnder 17 USC 119(e), satellite television subscribers may transfer to a different satellite carrier and retain their grandfathered rights to receive... |
09/18/2001 | 00-15378 |
PEOPLE v. TAFOYACalifornia Court of Appeal
Communications Law, Criminal Law & ProcedurePenal Code section 591, which makes it a crime injure or obstruct a telephone line, applies to a defendant who removed the battery from a cordless... |
09/12/2001 | E029271 |
TEXAS OFFICE OF PUB. UTIL. COUNSEL v. FED. COMMUNICATIONS COMM'NUnited States Fifth Circuit
Administrative Law, Communications LawSince the Administrative Procedures Act does not require a second round of notice-and-comment, an abbreviated notice-and-comment period does not... |
09/10/2001 | 00-60434 |
LOVEJOY v. AT&T CORP.California Court of Appeal
Communications Law, Injury & Tort LawAn allegation of "slamming", where plaintiff alleges that a phone carrier transferred his telephone number without his consent or knowledge, is... |
09/05/2001 | C034423 |
GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOMMS., INC. V. FED. COMMUNICATIONS COMM'NUnited States DC Circuit
Communications LawThe FCC's determination that an interex-change carriers must pay a LEC PSP compensation merely upon certification that the LEC has discontinued... |
08/21/2001 | 00-1204 |
CABLE ARIZONA CORP. v. COXCOM, INC.United States Ninth Circuit
Communications Law, Property Law & Real EstateSection 621(a)(2) of the Cable Communications Policy Act does not allow cable companies access to individual units in private apartment complexes... |
08/17/2001 | 99-17406 |
GOLDBERG v. CABLEVISION SYS. CORP.United States Second Circuit
Communications LawUnder the Cable Act, a cable provider may not edit an advertisement for tapes and transcripts of a cablecast on a public access channel where the... |
08/14/2001 | 99-9411 |
PRICE v. TURNERUnited States Ninth Circuit
Communications LawThe pre-1994 version of the Wiretap Act, 18 USC 2510, 2511, does not prohibit the recording of cordless telephone conversations. |
08/14/2001 | 00-15026 |
Results 1071 to 1080 of 1148