all - Opinion Summaries
Page 29 of 48
Showing Result 281 - 290 of 471
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.Supreme Court of Illinois
Injury & Tort Law, Product LiabilityIn a strict liability and negligence suit arising from a deadly fire caused by a lighter designed and manufactured by defendant, summary judgement for... |
02/16/2007 | 101089 |
Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of California
Consumer Protection Law, Evidence, Health Law, Injury & Tort Law, Product Liability, Civil ProcedureThere is no special presumption that smokers are aware of the addictiveness or health hazards of smoking, but there is a general, rebuttable... |
02/15/2007 | S132772 |
In re Bose Corp.United States Federal Circuit
Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, TrademarkA decision denying Bose registration of a proposed speaker design as a trademark is affirmed where the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board correctly... |
02/08/2007 | 06-1173 |
Pioneer Elecs. (USA), Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountySupreme Court of California
Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Constitutional Law, Consumer Protection LawThis appeal raised the issue of the extent to which California's right to privacy provision protects purchasers of potentially defective DVD players... |
01/25/2007 | S133794 |
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hamilton BeachUnited States Second Circuit
Contracts, Insurance Law, Product LiabilityIn subrogation action seeking to recover sums paid to plaintiffs' respective insureds for covered losses sustained in a residential fire allegedly... |
01/05/2007 | 04-6282 |
Galeno v. Blockbuster, Inc.United States Second Circuit
Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Consumer Protection LawDenial of motion to remand a class action -- involving disgruntled customers of Blockbuster alleging that the "no late fee" program is a decptive... |
12/26/2006 | 05-8019 |
Galeno v. Blockbuster, Inc.United States Second Circuit
Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Consumer Protection LawDenial of motion to remand a class action -- involving disgruntled customers of Blockbuster alleging that the "no late fee" program is a decptive... |
12/26/2006 | 05-8019 |
Galeno v. Blockbuster, Inc.United States Second Circuit
Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Consumer Protection LawDenial of motion to remand a class action -- involving disgruntled customers of Blockbuster alleging that the "no late fee" program is a decptive... |
12/26/2006 | 05-8019 |
Galeno v. Blockbuster, Inc.United States Second Circuit
Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Consumer Protection LawDenial of motion to remand class action -- involving disgruntled customers of Blockbuster alleging that the "no late fee" program is a decptive forced... |
12/26/2006 | 05-8019 |
Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. v. ChapaSupreme Court of Texas
Attorney's Fees, Consumer Protection Law, Contracts, Injury & Tort Law, RemediesA decision reinstating an award for plaintiff with modification in an action brought against a car dealer for breach of contract, fraud, and the Texas... |
12/22/2006 | 04-0961 |
Results 281 to 290 of 471