California Court of Appeal - Opinion Summaries
Page 1647 of 1687
Showing Result 16461 - 16470 of 16863
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
SMITH v. SHN CONSULTING ENG'RS & GEOLOGISTS, INC.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort LawThe two-year statute governing claims for breach of an oral contract, Code Civ. Proc. 339(1), applies to a general contractor's claims against an... |
05/30/2001 | A088522 |
JIE v. LIANG TAI KNITWEAR CO, LTD.California Court of Appeal
Immigration Law, Labor & Employment LawThe Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 does not preempt a state law claim that employer wrongfully terminated employee for reporting employer... |
05/30/2001 | B135141 |
M. G. v. TIME WARNER, INC.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort LawMinors alleging invasion of privacy from defendant's publication of them in photograph with child molester have a reasonable probability of succeeding... |
05/30/2001 | E027632 |
PEOPLE v. STEVENSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingUnder Penal Code section 1170, a sentencing court has the authority and the obligation to order a defendant to report to the parole office closest to... |
05/29/2001 | C036593 |
LEADER v. HEALTH INDUS. OF AM. INC.California Court of Appeal
Civil ProcedureA party may not use the mandatory relief provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b) for vacating a default judgment due to counsel's mistake... |
05/29/2001 | B134874 |
ZAXIS WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. MOTOR SOUND CORP.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, RemediesA defendant's negative net worth will not preclude a trial court assessing punitive damages when defendant has the ability to pay the award. |
05/29/2001 | C035616 |
PEOPLE v. SALAZAR-MERINOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Immigration LawFederal immigration law does not preempt California Penal Code section 114, which prohibits the use of a false document to conceal true citizenship... |
05/29/2001 | A090898 |
HICKS v. E. T. LEGG & ASSOCIATESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Bankruptcy Law, Property Law & Real EstateCivil Code 2924c(e), and 2924g(d) do not prohibit the postponement of a foreclosure sale for successive periods of five of fewer business days during... |
05/25/2001 | D034398 |
NELSON v. SUPERIOR COURT (COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Communications Law, Injury & Tort LawA government tort claim is a "claim" within the meaning of Government Code section 26202.6, which requires the county to preserve recordings of... |
05/25/2001 | B147607 |
COVENANT CARE, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT (INCLAN)California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort LawCode of Civ. Proc. 425.13, which bars an amendment for punitive damages against a health care provider in negligence action two years after after the... |
05/25/2001 | B145406 |
Results 16461 to 16470 of 16863