California Court of Appeal - Opinion Summaries
Page 1636 of 1687
Showing Result 16351 - 16360 of 16863
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
DEP'T OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. ROSIE H.California Court of Appeal
Family LawThe preponderance of evidence standard applies to termination of visitation proceedings under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, in... |
07/13/2001 | C036963 |
PROF'L ENG'RS IN CALIFORNIA GOV'T v. STATE PERS. BD.California Court of Appeal
Administrative Law, Labor & Employment LawThe Career Executive Assignment program does not violate the "Civil Service Mandate" of the California Constitution. |
07/12/2001 | C028402 |
MACHADO v. STATE WATER RES. CONTROL BD.California Court of Appeal
Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental LawRegional water quality control board's pre-hearing issuance of a cleanup and abatement order for alleged discharges of manure and wastewater into... |
07/12/2001 | C032572 |
PEOPLE v. GRIFFINCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureUnder Penal Code sections 459, evidence that appellants entered apartment for the specific purpose of tracking down the victim in order to assault... |
07/12/2001 | A090561 |
IN RE: MARINNA J.California Court of Appeal
Family Law, Indian LawParents who had their parental rights terminated may raise on appeal the Department of Social Services' failure to comply with the Indian Child... |
07/12/2001 | C036453 |
CWYNAR v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Landlord Tenant LawA city ordinance restricting the ability of an owner of residential rental property to evict tenants to enable the owner or owner's relatives to move... |
07/11/2001 | A089841 |
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. v. PIETAKCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil ProcedureUnder Code of Civil Procedure section 473, an attorney's misunderstanding on the necessity of filing a cross-complaint in response to an interpleader... |
07/11/2001 | C028694 |
IN RE: MARRIAGE OF DUNCANCalifornia Court of Appeal
Family LawEvidence that spouse made at least 97% of investment decisions in investment advice business is sufficient to justify calculating the community... |
07/11/2001 | D033482 |
IN RE: LANCE V.California Court of Appeal
Family LawA juvenile court may not alter visitation rights without a petition for modification. |
07/11/2001 | F037282 |
MUSSER v. PROVENCHERCalifornia Court of Appeal
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Legal MalpracticeCo-counsel may seek equitable indemnity against one another where one counsel has associated another to assist in a particular aspect of the case, and... |
07/10/2001 | A088934 |
Results 16351 to 16360 of 16863