California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

IN RE: MARRIAGE OF DUNCAN, D033482

Evidence that spouse made at least 97% of investment decisions in investment advice business is sufficient to justify calculating the community property of the business at time of separation, and not the time of trial.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/11/2001
  • Published 07/11/2001

Judges

  •  KREMER, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Law Offices of Marjorie G. Fuller, Marjorie G. Fuller, Fullerton;  Seltzer Caplan Wilkins & McMahon, Gerald L. McMahon and Lee E. Hejmanowski, San Diego, for Appellant Carol C. Duncan., Lorenz, Alhadeff, Cannon & Rose, Cannon, Parks & Oberhansley, Robert J. Parks, Jerry M. Cannon, and Marjeta D. Six, San Diego;  Law Offices of Stephen Temko and Stephen Temko, for Appellant William H. Duncan, Jr.

Copied to clipboard