California Court of Appeal - Opinion Summaries
Page 1624 of 1687
Showing Result 16231 - 16240 of 16863
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. SCOTTCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureA court need not grant a criminal defendant's motion to represent himself four days before trial after two unsuccessful motions to substitute counsel. |
08/28/2001 | B112469 |
ALLIED MUT. INS. CO. v. WEBBCalifornia Court of Appeal
Insurance LawAn insured may not ratify the nonpermitted use of a vehicle by its employee after an accident so as to impose liability on the insurer. |
08/28/2001 | F034484 |
DANDONA v. ARALUCECalifornia Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Family LawRetroactive application of Family Code section 3653, which allows a party who makes overpayments of support to obtain reimbursement, is... |
08/27/2001 | B143566 |
PEOPLE v. JAMESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingIf a defendant-s current offense was committed on or after the effective date of Proposition 21, a determination whether the defendant-s prior... |
08/27/2001 | B146548 |
PRATA v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (BANK ONE)California Court of Appeal
Consumer Protection LawA cause of action asserting that a bank was responsible for false and misleading advertising is suitable as a representative action, even though there... |
08/27/2001 | B146295 |
PEOPLE v. BRITTONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & ProcedurePermitting the prosecution to respond orally to a suppression motion at a preliminary hearing does not violate a defendant's right to due process. |
08/27/2001 | G025710 |
JAMES 3 CORP. v. TRUCK INS. EXCH.California Court of Appeal
Insurance LawAn insurer's refusal to pay for the prosecution of a counter-claim does not raise a sufficient conflict of interest to require retention of Cumis... |
08/24/2001 | H020687 |
CESAR V. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY (ORANGE COUNTY SOC. SERV. AGENCY)California Court of Appeal
Family LawRelative placement preference, under Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.3, applies when a new placement becomes necessary after reunification... |
08/24/2001 | G028726 |
THRIFTY OIL CO. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (LINDER)California Court of Appeal
Consumer Protection LawEvidence that gas station had to pay fee to credit card company for credit purchases is sufficient to support claim that charging less for cash... |
08/24/2001 | B149357 |
STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (PEOPLE)California Court of Appeal
EvidenceState worker's compensation fund may assert attorney-client privilege even if the insured employer in the underlying case does not object to... |
08/24/2001 | B150183 |
Results 16231 to 16240 of 16863