California Court of Appeal - Opinion Summaries
Page 1473 of 1687
Showing Result 14721 - 14730 of 16863
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
LEE v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METRO. TRANSIT AUTH.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Injury & Tort Law, Property Law & Real EstateIn an action for continuous and repeated damage to real property based on inverse condemnation and nuisance, the cause of action does not accrue until... |
04/04/2003 | B155843 |
PEOPLE v. PORTILLOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureConviction for first degree murder under the felony-murder doctrine is affirmed, where the trial court's alleged erroneous answer to a jury question... |
04/04/2003 | D038761 |
IN RE VITAMIN CASESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Commercial Law, Consumer Protection Law, Drugs & BiotechCode of Civil Procedure section 384 does not bar settlement of a class claim alleging price-fixing by vitamin product manufacturers, as neither that... |
04/03/2003 | A097905 |
WEBER v. UNITED PARCEL SERV., INC.California Court of Appeal
Health Law, Injury & Tort Law, Labor & Employment Law, Workers' CompensationA tort claim alleging injuries as a result of a tumor not diagnosed, following tests administered by an employer, comes under the exclusive provisions... |
04/03/2003 | B153284 |
PEOPLE v. CHAGOYANCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureAfter dismissal of drug charges, the trial court abused its discretion in denying, without conducting an evidentiary hearing, a Penal Code section... |
04/03/2003 | B160159 |
HARBOR ISLAND HOLDINGS, L.L.C. v. KIMCalifornia Court of Appeal
Contracts, Landlord Tenant Law, Property Law & Real EstateA residential lease provision for doubled rent in the event of a breach was unenforceable as a penalty. |
04/02/2003 | G030264 |
PEOPEL v. HENDERSONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingBecause Pen. Code section 1202.45 became effective after defendant committed the crimes, the trial court erred in imposing the parole revocation fine.... |
04/02/2003 | E029887 |
PFEIFFER VENICE PROPERTIES v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (BERNARD)California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Landlord Tenant LawPost-appeal peremptory challenges, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6(2), are not the exclusive right of parties who were appellants on... |
04/02/2003 | B162707 |
REYNOLDS v. BEMENTCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Labor & Employment LawSince plaintiff has chosen to stand on those causes of action as to which the trial court granted leave to amend, he cannot amend the First Amended... |
04/02/2003 | B158966 |
WOODSIDE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (FOGLER)California Court of Appeal
Construction, Contracts, Property Law & Real EstateA clause requiring homebuyers who sue the builder to submit the dispute to binding judicial reference is binding. |
04/02/2003 | E032446 |
Results 14721 to 14730 of 16863