California Court of Appeal

Since plaintiff has chosen to stand on those causes of action as to which the trial court granted leave to amend, he cannot amend the First Amended Complaint to allege more specific facts relating to overtime wage violations committed against automobile paint shop workers.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/02/2003
• Published 04/02/2003

Judges

• NOTT, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• The Legal Solutions Group, Robert S. Boulter, San Francisco;  Law Office of Jonathan Weiss and Jonathan Weiss, Beverly Hills, for Plaintiff and Appellant., Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Ellyn Moscowitz, Anaheim, Joanna Mittman for The Building and Construction Trades Council of Alameda County, The Building and Construction Trades Council of Los Angeles and Orange Counties, The Building and Construction Trades Council of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, The District Council of Iron Workers for the State of California and Vicinity, The Northern California Carpenters Regional Council, The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 11, The Painters District Council Local 36, The Roofers Union Locals 81, 36 and 220, The Sprinkler Fitters United Association, Local 483;  Saperstein, Goldstein, Demchak & Baller, David Borgen, Oakland, Darci Burrell and Joshua Konecky, for The Impact Fund, Asian Law Caucus, Inc., Asian Pacific American Legal Center, California Employment Lawyers Association, The Legal Aid Society-Employment Law Center, La Raza Centro Legal, Inc., and Women's Employment Rights Clinic at Golden Gate University School of Law as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Munger, Tolles & Olson, Alan V. Friedman, Kathleen M. McDowell, Linda S. Goldman, Los Angeles, and Katherine M. Forster for Defendants and Respondents., Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker and Paul Grossman, Los Angeles, for California Employment Law Council as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.