United States Supreme Court
SEC v. EDWARDS, 02-1196
An investment scheme promising a fixed rate of return can be an "investment contract" and thus a "security" subject to the federal securities laws. There is no reason to distinguish between promises of fixed returns and promises of variable returns when determining whether a particular scheme is an investment contract.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/13/2004
- Published 01/13/2004
Judges
Court
- United States Supreme Court