Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


INTERGRAPH CORP. v. INTEL CORP., 00-1368

The discovery of new evidence relating to allegedly anticompetitive behavior does not justify relitigating issues previously dismissed because the plaintiff lacked standing.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/08/2001
  • Published 06/08/2001

Judges

  • PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, RADER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • William L. Jaeger, Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, of San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were Richard L. Grossman and Margaret C. McHugh.   Of counsel on the brief was David Vance Lucas, General Counsel, Intergraph Corporation, of Huntsville, AL. Also of counsel on the brief were John G. Roberts, Jr., and Jonathan S. Franklin, Hogan & Hartson L.L.P., of Washington, DC.

  • For Appellees:
  • Marc G. Schildkraut, Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were Joel M. Freed, Darren B. Bernhard, and Howard T. Rosenblatt.   Of counsel was Mary F. Walters.   Of counsel on the brief were Peter N. Detkin and Thomas C. Reynolds, Intel Corporation, of Santa Clara, CA.
Copied to clipboard