Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


CONSOLIDATED EDISON v. US, 99-1464

Monetary damage claims before the Court of Federal Claims are not an "adequate remedy" for claim for equitable, prospective relief concerning annual assessments on nuclear utilities for decontamination and decommissioning costs under 42 USC 2297(g)(1994).

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/05/2000
  • Published 12/05/2000

Judges

  • RADER, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Melvin C. Garbow, Arnold & Porter, of Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Sacramento Municipal Utility District.   With him on the brief was Howard N. Cayne.

  • For Appellees:
  • Daniel R. Murdock,Winston & Strawn, of New York, NY, for plaintiffs-appellees., Mark W. Pennak, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for defendants-appellant.   With him on the brief was Barbara C. Biddle.
Copied to clipboard