United States Eighth Circuit

Failure to pay relocation benefits did not constitute a breach of contract, and since plaintiff was not entitled to the benefits he sought, denial of those benefits did not create an action for unjust enrichment. Plaintiff failed to show that the defendant's legitimate, non-discriminatory ground for its decision not to hire him was a pretext for age discrimination.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/15/2003
• Published 12/15/2003

Judges

• HANSEN, Circuit Judge., Before SMITH and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and READE, District Judge.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Pamela M. Miller, argued, Red Wing, MN (William Mavity, Red Wing, MN, on the brief), for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Marko J. Mrkonich of Minneapolis, MN. Heather C. Sherman of Minneapolis appeared on the brief.