United States Third Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

Avila v. Attorney General US, 15-1860

In a native and citizen of Mexico's petition for review of a Final Administrative Removal Order (FARO) issued by an Assistant Field Office Director with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the petition is denied over petitioner's claims that: 1) DHS erred by placing him in expedited administrative removal proceedings because his crime is not an aggravated felony for purposes of removal under INA section 237(a)(2)(A)(iii), 8 U.S.C. section1227(a)(2)(A)(iii); 2) the FARO is invalid; and 3) the conduct of simultaneous proceedings before the Immigration Judge and DHS resulted in a deprivation of his right to due process.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2016/06/23

Judges

  • SMITH

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard