United States Third Circuit
Singh v. Att'y General, 11-1988
In a case in which the government sought to remove a Jamaican national for an aggravated felony based on his conviction of knowingly making a false statement under penalty of perjury in a bankruptcy proceeding in violation of 18 USC section 152(3), a petition for review of a BIA order of removal is granted, where: 1) a conviction under 18 USC section 152(3) necessarily entails deceit and therefore qualifies as a potential aggravated felony "deceit" offense; 2) the fact that the petitioner was not removable for a perjury-based aggravated felony did not mean he was not removable for a deceit-based aggravated felony; but 3) the petitioner's offense was not a deceit-based aggravated felony because it did not cause an actual loss of $10,000 or more.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/16/2012
- Published 04/16/2012
Judges
- Van Antwerpen
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Thomas E. Moseley, Jesse M. Bless