United States Third Circuit

Auto leases violated the Consumer Leasing Act's disclosure requirements because the method for assessing early termination charges was not contained in the respective leases. However, as plaintiffs-lessees lack standing to challenge the early termination charge that was never applied to them, their challenge to that formula need not be addressed.

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/11/2003
• Decided 03/22/2004
• Published 03/22/2004

Judges

• Before ALITO and McKEE, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Darryl J. May, (Argued), Raymond A. Quaglia, Amy B. Carver, Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee, NMAC., Cary L. Flitter, (Argued), Lundy, Flitter, Beldecos & Berger, P.C., Narberth, PA, Michael D. Donovan, Donovan Searles, LLC, Philadelphia, PA, Kirby, McInerney & Squire, LLP, New York, NY, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants, Miller and Rose.