United States Third Circuit
ROMERO v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM, 01-3273
Where plaintiff claimed she was entitled to a civil penalty because the administrator of her employer's plan did not provide requested plan documents within the time specified by statute, the district court misconstrued ERISA section 502(c)(1), which governs the civil-penalty issue.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/30/2002
- Published 10/30/2002
Judges
- Before: ALITO and FUENTES, Circuit Judges, and OBERDORFER, District Judge.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Robert H. Jaffe (Argued), Robert H. Jaffe & Associates, P.A., Springfield, NJ, Counsel for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Jacqueline V. Guynn, Brian T. Ortelere (Argued), Jeffrey K. Techentin, Pepper Hamilton, L.L.P., Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Appellees.