United States Third Circuit

Where plaintiff presented evidence that the supervisor responsible for firing him wanted "younger" employees, and warned him that, because of his age, he "wouldn't be happy there in the future," the court erred in determining that plaintiff failed to offer direct evidence of discrimination under Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989).

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/07/2002
• Decided 10/24/2002
• Published 10/24/2002

Judges

• Before SLOVITER and AMBRO, Circuit Judges SHADUR, District Judge.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Andrew M. Smith (Argued), Marcino, Bowman & Smith, Fort Washington, PA, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• John M. Elliott, Eric J. Bronstein (Argued), Raymond J. Santarelli, Elliott, Reihner, Siedzikowski & Egan, Blue Bell, PA, for Appellee.