United States Third Circuit

Because substantial evidence supports the NLRB's finding that an employer failed to satisfy at least some of the requirements for soliciting employees to appear in an anti-union video, the Board's determination that the employer violated section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA was upheld.

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/07/2002
• Decided 08/26/2002
• Published 08/26/2002

Judges

• BEFORE:  SLOVITER and AMBRO, Circuit Judges, and SHADUR, District Judge.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• J. Anthony Messina,Vincent J. Pentima (argued), Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling, Philadelphia, PA, for Allegheny Ludlum Corporation., Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Robert J. Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, James M. Oleske, Jr. (argued), Attorney National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board., Richard J. Brean (argued), Associate General Counsel, United Steelworkers of America, Pittsburgh, PA, for Intervenor, United Steelworkers of America.