Skip to main content

United States Third Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

US v. BOONE, 99-5439, 99-5695, 99-5894

Even where the precise amount of crack cocaine manufactured by the defendant was uncertain, the district court erred in reducing defendant-s Offense Level and Guidelines Range by ignoring credible evidence that he manufactured at least 200 grams of crack.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/29/2002
  • Published 01/30/2002


  • Before ROTH, McKEE and RENDELL, Circuit Judges.


  • United States Third Circuit


  • For Appellant:
  • David E. Schafer (Argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, Trenton, NJ, Attorney for appellant Boone in No. 99-5439.

  • For Appellees:
  • David L. Rhoads (Argued), Trenton, NJ, Attorney for Appellant Weston in No. 99-5695 and cross-appellee in No. 99-5894., Robert J. Cleary, United States Attorney, Norman Gross (Argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Camden, NJ, Attorneys for appellee in Nos. 99-5439/5695 and cross-appellant in No. 99-5894.
Copied to clipboard