United States Third Circuit
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF NEW JERSEY, INC. v. VERIZON NEW JERSEY, INC., 00-2000
Where the district court remanded the case to the Board of Public Utilities for further rate determination, a third party intervenor representing rate-payers lacks standing to appeal because there is no remedy that will alter the situation.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/21/2001
- Decided 11/01/2001
- Published 11/01/2001
Judges
- Before ROTH, AMBRO and FUENTES, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Blossom A. Peretz (argued), Ratepayer Advocate, Division of the Ratepayer Advocate, Newark, NJ, Attorney for Appellant New Jersey Division of the Ratepayer Advocate.
- For Appellees:
- Frederic K. Becker (argued), Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, A Professional Corporation, Woodbridge, NJ, Attorney for Appellee Verizon New Jersey, Inc., Eugene P. Provost, Deputy Attorney General (argued), John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, R.J. Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, NJ, Attorney for Appellees New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, Herbert H. Tate and Carmen J. Armenti in their capacities as Commissioners of the Board of Public Utilities.