Findings that defendant is not liable for certain breaches of fiduciary duties imposed by ERISA, and that damages based on certain other fiduciary breaches would stop accruing on December 31, 2003, are reversed as the district court erred as in holding that: 1) defendant did not breach his fiduciary duties under ERISA each time he raised his own and his son's salary without trustee approval; 2) damages would stop accruing on December 31, 2003; and 3) damages would not be awarded based on pension benefits yet to be received by defendant.