United States Tenth Circuit
US v. Geiner, 06-8055
A sentence for attempted interstate transportation of child pornography and possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in applying a five-level increase to defendant's sentence under U.S.S.G. section 2G2.2(b)(3)(B), which enhances a sentence based on "[d]istribution for the receipt, or expectation of receipt, of a thing of value, but not for pecuniary gain"; and 2) the district court did not apply the Guidelines in a mandatory fashion and its method for calculating defendant's sentence was procedurally reasonable.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/20/2007
- Published 08/21/2007
Judges
- TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge., Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, MURPHY, Circuit Judge, and LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Loretta R. Green, Assistant Federal Public Defender (Raymond P. Moore, Federal Public Defender, with her on the briefs), Office of the Federal Public Defender, Cheyenne, WY, appearing for Defendant-Appellant., Stuart S. Healy, III, Assistant United States Attorney (Matthew H. Mead, United States Attorney, with him on the brief), Office of the United States Attorney, Cheyenne, WY, appearing for Plaintiff-Appellee.