United States Tenth Circuit

A sentence for wire fraud, fraud, and money laundering is affirmed over a claim that the district court erred by computing a consolidated sentencing guideline range and the sentence imposed was unreasonable because it was in excess of the range contemplated in the plea agreements, and that the advisory application of the guidelines violated ex post facto principles.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/22/2006
• Published 09/22/2006

Judges

• O'BRIEN, Circuit Judge., Before HARTZ, HOLLOWAY and O'BRIEN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• H. Michael Steinberg, Englewood, CO, for Defendant-Appellant., Jerry N. Jones, Assistant United States Attorney (William J. Leone, United States Attorney, and Andrew A. Vogt, Assistant United States Attorney, on the briefs), Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.