United States Tenth Circuit

A disparity between a federal-court sentence and the sentence that would be imposed for a like offense in state court does not make the sentence unreasonable. A conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed over a reasonableness challenge.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/30/2006
• Published 08/30/2006

Judges

• HARTZ, Circuit Judge., Before TACHA, HARTZ, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Jessica J. Travis, Olathe, KS, for Defendant-Appellant., Eric F. Melgren, United States Attorney, Kim I. Martin, Assistant United States Attorney, Kansas City, KS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.