Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Tenth Circuit


SOUTHWESTERN BELL TEL. CO. v. APPLE, 00-6030

An end-user limitation, imposed by a phone company on its optional toll calling plans, was not an unreasonable resale restriction under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/16/2002
  • Published 10/16/2002

Judges

  • EBEL, Circuit Judge., Before EBEL, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Colin S. Stretch (Mary W. Marks, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Oklahoma City, OK, Michael K. Kellogg & Sean A. Lev, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, & Evans, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, with him on the briefs), Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd & Evans, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael J. Hunseder (Lawrence Lafaro, AT & T Corp., Basking Ridge, NJ, Mark Witcher, AT & T Corp, Austin, TX, & David L. Lawson, Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, Washington, DC, with him on the brief), Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee, AT & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc., Rachel Lawrence Mor, Deputy General Counsel, Andrea Johnson, Senior Attorney, Oklahoma City, OK, submitted a brief for Defendant Appellee, Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
Copied to clipboard