In an action for alleged wrongdoing related to notes purchased by plaintiff from defendant, the certified questions from the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware are answered as follows: 1) a trust indenture's "no-action" clause that specifically precludes enforcement of contractual claims arising under the indenture, but omits reference to "the Securities," does not bar a security-holder's independent common law or statutory claims; and 2) the Court of Chancery's finding that the no-action clause, which refers only to "this Indenture," precludes enforcement only of contractual claims arising under the Indenture is a correct application of New York law.