Court of Appeals of New York
State of New York v. Charada T., 76
In a Mental Hygiene Law article 10 proceeding seeking to determine whether defendant is a detained sex offender requiring civil management, the New York Supreme Court erred by permitting an expert witness to introduce hearsay testimony about a fourth rape crime that defendant was never charged with committing, but this error was harmless under the circumstances.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/08/2014
- Published 05/08/2014
Judges
- ABDUS-SALAAM
Court
- Court of Appeals of New York