Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal

Aroa Marketing, Inc. v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, B228051

In an action alleging defendant's breach of its duty to defend or indemnify, judgment of the trial court is affirmed where it correctly interpreted an insurance contract provision that specifically excluded coverage for "personal and advertising injury" arising out of "any violation of any intellectual property rights" as precluding coverage for the underlying litigation.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/23/2011
  • Published 08/23/2011




  • California Court of Appeal


Copied to clipboard